Europe Wants More From Its Investors Than Money

Many of the enquiries we take now come from people who lead with what they do rather than what they hold.

Founders, researchers, senior executives and specialists want to know whether their track record counts for anything, and increasingly the answer is yes.

For years, investment migration worked on a simple proposition. You made a qualifying investment, and you received residency or, in a handful of countries, citizenship. That model still exists and it still works.

Alongside it, though, a second type of route has grown up, one that looks at the wider value an applicant brings.

Specialist expertise, entrepreneurship, innovation, research, an exceptional professional record or activity in a sector a government wants to build can all form part of the case.

This is not a story about doors closing. It is a story about a wider spectrum of options, and about knowing which part of that spectrum you sit in.

What Has Already Changed in Europe

The direction of travel is easy to trace. Portugal removed real estate as a qualifying Golden Visa investment in 2023, and the Program has run on private equity funds and other qualifying routes since.

Spain closed its Golden Visa in 2025. Across the EU, scrutiny of purely transactional routes has grown, particularly where citizenship is involved, and policymakers now place far more weight on applicants forming a real connection with the country granting their status.

What has not happened is a retreat from the competition for internationally mobile wealth and talent. Governments still want both.

They have simply become more specific about the people, the expertise and the economic activity they are trying to attract, and that specificity opens opportunities for anyone who can offer more than capital alone.

Malta and The Shift Towards Merit

Malta gives us the clearest example. The country has moved away from its former investment-led citizenship framework towards a much more selective approach built around exceptional contribution and genuine merit.

The difference matters. Under a conventional citizenship-by-investment program, the investment does the work and the applicant’s background sits in the file as a compliance matter. Under a merit-led approach, the applicant’s achievements are the case.

Scientific and academic distinction, research with real-world application, exceptional business or entrepreneurial success, cultural and sporting achievement, and expertise in fields a country actively wants to strengthen all move from the background to the foreground.

For the right individual, that is a very different proposition, and a more flattering one. What you have built becomes the reason a country wants you.

Portugal Shows How Two Routes Can Sit Side By Side

Portugal is useful because it runs both models at once, and applicants can choose the one that fits.

The Golden Visa remains open through qualifying investment, with the €500,000 fund route the most widely used option.

It carries a low physical stay requirement of seven days a year on average, permanent residence becomes available at five years, and it is possible to apply for citizenship at ten years under the rules in force since May 2026, or seven years for EU and CPLP nationals.

Running alongside it is a second, talent-led pathway aimed at people who bring highly qualified activity rather than passive capital. It centres on research and business involvement, on applied expertise, and on creating genuine economic value inside Portugal.

The financial commitment is lower than the fund route, but the applicant has to contribute something the country actually wants, and that contribution has to be real and documented.

Portugal’s IFICI tax regime (NHR 2.0) tells the same story. The incentives now target particular professions, activities and sectors that the government considers strategically important, rather than offering a broad benefit to anyone who moves.

Portugal still wants international talent and capital. It has just become far more specific about which kinds.

Italy Looks At the Applicant, Not Only The Investment

Italy’s Investor Visa points to another version of the same trend, where governments assess the profile of the applicant rather than the transaction in isolation.

Alongside the qualifying investment itself, applicants have to demonstrate at least €1,000,000 in transferable liquid financial assets.

That requirement sits separately from the money going into the investment, and it positions the Program as one of Europe’s more exclusive residency-by-investment routes.

The point is financial substance. Italy wants to see the standing behind the cheque, not simply the cheque.

The UAE Shows This Is Not Only a European Story

Outside Europe, the UAE has built the most visible example of a program that treats talent as an asset class in its own right.

Its Golden Visa reaches well beyond investors. Eligible categories include:

• Entrepreneurs and founders of approved ventures
• Scientists and researchers with recognised standing
• Doctors and specialists in priority medical fields
• Inventors and holders of valuable intellectual property
• Creatives in culture and the arts
• Senior executives and business leaders
• Outstanding athletes and coaches
• Outstanding students and graduates

That list reads like an economic development plan, because it is one.

The UAE has decided which capabilities it wants in the country over the next twenty years and built a visa category around each of them.

Other governments are watching, and the competition for human capital now runs in parallel with the competition for financial capital.

Two Races, One Prize

Golden Visas have helped fuel the outperformance of several European economies, and that is the part of the story most commentary misses. Governments did not simply tolerate these Programs. They watched them work.

Our analysis of GDP growth across the EU and Golden Visa economies found that Portugal, Greece and Malta have all outgrown the wider Eurozone since 2017, with Malta’s economy expanding by more than 50% over the period.

Investors in these Programs are not buying a document from a stagnant country. They are buying into some of Europe’s better-performing economies, and their capital forms part of the reason those economies perform.

That explains why investment-led routes have not disappeared as merit routes have emerged. Two races are running at once.

One is for global wealth, the other is for global talent, and the countries that are serious about growth are competing in both. Malta pursues exceptional individuals through merit while its economy compounds on the back of the investment that came before.

Portugal courts researchers and founders while its Golden Visa keeps channelling capital into qualifying funds. These are not competing philosophies but two instruments pointed at the same target.

Capital Still Opens the Door For Most Investors

None of this makes traditional Golden Visas less relevant. The growth figures make the opposite case. Programs that move real capital into real economies have earned their place, and governments know exactly what that capital has bought them.

Merit-led routes can be demanding. They may ask for exceptional achievements, recognised qualifications, a specialist career or a very particular contribution, and most successful people, including many extremely wealthy ones, will not meet criteria of that kind.

A property developer, a family business owner, a retired executive or a professional investor may have every reason to want a second residency and no interest in submitting a research record.

Investment-led programs answer that need directly. Portugal continues to offer residency through qualifying funds.

Greece runs three real estate thresholds, at €250,000 for qualifying commercial-to-residential conversions and restoration projects, €400,000 across most of the country, and €800,000 in Athens, Thessaloniki and the larger islands.

Hungary offers an investment-led residency route. Caribbean citizenship Programs continue to provide established donation and real estate options from US$200,000.

These routes ask for meaningful capital, and – aside from the usual due diligence checks – applicants are not required to demonstrate a particular talent, skill set or career record.

At La Vida we have worked with clients from every imaginable background, from Uber drivers and tech workers through to entrepreneurs, celebrities and ultra-high-net-worth families.

There is no single profile of a Golden Visa investor, and that is precisely the strength of the model.

More Choice, Not Less

Put the two models side by side and the picture is a broader market rather than a narrower one.

At one end sit established investment-led Programs, open to anyone with the capital and a clean file, and pointed at economies that have consistently outperformed the Eurozone average.

At the other sit increasingly selective routes that look past wealth towards expertise, achievement and contribution. Some of those merit routes ask for less money, and more of everything else.

Neither model replaces the other, and the most interesting cases we see involve people who qualify for both and have to choose. Capital opens the door for many applicants.

For others, it will be a patent, a company, a body of research or thirty years at the top of a profession. Both are worth something to a government building a growth story, and working out which category you fall into is the first real decision. It often reveals options that go well beyond the traditional Golden Visa.

If you are curious about your options, get in touch with La Vida’s experts to learn more.

FAQs